October 2011-- During the next six months, The Canary Report will be dedicated solely to me sharing my experiences while on the Gupta Amygdala Retraining program for MCS. If you'd like to be notified by email when blog entries are made, please subscribe in the right hand column below. During the entire six months, this blog will remain online but Our Canary Report network and forum will be offline and inaccessible to our members. Thank you for all your support! Aloha, Susie
 

Following a presentation about toxic cleaning products I made to the board of the daycare, they decided to adopt the Toronto District School Board’s Scented Products Awareness Program. But there is still more change needed to make the facility a truly nontoxic and safe place.

By guest blogger Nancy in Toronto.

When my family toured my son’s new daycare at the end of the summer 2010, I spied dryer sheets in the laundry room attached to the preschool room. At the time, I figured that if the daycare stopped using the dryer sheets, I would be comfortable sending my child to the program.

But after the dryer sheets were taken out of the classroom, my son still came home with so much chemical fragrance in his hair and on his clothes that it literally made me sick to have him sit on my lap. I was worried about what the health risks were for him being in that environment all day.

After some mostly promising and then progressively colder back-and-forth emails, the president of the board of the daycare asked me to speak to the board about my concerns about chemical cleaning products and personal care products in the classroom.

I decided to do a presentation and in my research, I learned that the science was already there identifying the risks that chemicals pose to children (including cancer, learning problems and aggression problems). As well, it was a surprise to learn that 100% plant-based products designed for the commercial/institutional setting are already available and that they cost less locally than the products currently in use at the daycare.

There was no quorum at the board meeting where I was asked to speak, but I spoke informally to the people that were there. I was not provided with the date of the board meeting where the matter was finally discussed, however, as a result of my presentation, I was informed that the daycare board made the decision to, as they phrased it, “go green.” They tasked the daycare director to choose a brand for the first four target products and, within a few months, an order was placed for Ecomax Laundry Wash and Hand Cleanser.

Despite the changes, my son was still on occasion coming home with fragrance in his hair and on his clothes, and on some days the classroom still had a heavy smell. Sure enough, one day I asked about it and let my nose sniff around and it turned out that one of the teachers was wearing perfume. The conversation deteriorated quickly and soon enough I got a nasty email. I replied by drawing their attention to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Scented Products Awareness Program, the Environmental Working Group’s 50- page report on perfume and toxicity , and a one hour lecture on childhood cancer:

In response, the daycare decided to adopt the TDSB’s Scented Products Awareness Program. This program promotes voluntary compliance with scent reduction, including avoiding scented products and scented laundry products. The board members told me very clearly, however, that this may not be the daycare for my family. I was also aggressively told at the same meeting that for this board, “green” means the adoption of the products I focused on in my presentation, and that they would not be doing anything more. I proposed they make use of an environmental health checklist put out by a reputable group based in Toronto and they said very quickly “no” without putting the matter to a vote.

The board also advised me they would not be spending any time on the matter, would not form a committee to look at environmental health issues (which I’ve been asking for since my first communication and offered to lead), and would not make the landslide of decisions that would be necessary on the “green” path, simply because it would involve a lot of work. They stated flat out that for the most part people don’t care (they said most certainly people don’t care about preventing cancer or learning problems). They said that this is not “that kind” of daycare, and that I am the only parent who has ever expressed any concern like this.

The daycare has elected a new board and I have now asked them to reduce the chemicals in the daycare menu:

  • Step one: eliminate food colouring.
  • Step two: eliminate other additives.
  • Step three: reduce pesticides by avoiding the Dirty Dozen  and taking advantage of resources such as purchasing organic food in bulk from the Ontario Natural Food Coop and Foodshare.

This time I did as much research as possible in finding economical alternatives before raising the topic and I have received an enthusiastic response from the very person who seemed least supportive last time around. I am sure this wave of change will take several months, but I feel good about lessening my own child’s risk of developing disorders like Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and diseases like cancer and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.

Click here to view a PDF of my presentation to the daycare board about cleaning products.

Nancy in Toronto

Photo by Kirsten Jennings.

 

A member of our canary community launches an online Fragrance-Free Worship Registry.

Little bird house shaped like a church.

Photo of bird house by Susan E. ©2011 Used with permission.

Susan E., a member of The Canary Report community, has launched Canary Sanctuaries, a website dedicated to information and listings on fragrance-free places of worship, retreat centers, seminaries and santuaries. The site is a wonderful resource and includes easy-to-use directories for the United States and Canada.

At the beginning of the 2011 Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Awareness Month (MCS Awareness Month), Canary Sanctuaries is announcing it’s website which is a Fragrance-Free Worship Registry and related information clearing house. The site is ecumenical and interfaith, and creates opportunities for congregations to register their house of worship as “fragrance-free.” It is also a place to find out more information about how to become a place where people with chemical injuries and olfactory and respiratory conditions can safely worship without the risks of allergic or pulmonary reactions, or cognitive and physiological distress.

Canaries, for those of you who are unfamiliar, is a term that chemically-injured people have recently applied to themselves, because they have become sensitive to many chemicals and feel like human sentinels. The name comes from the proverbial “canaries in the coal mines” (taken into the mines by miners because they would stop chirping and/or die in the presence of toxic gases.)

Multiple chemical sensitivity, environmental illness, toxic encephathalopathy and chemical injury are just a few names for this increasing epidemic which leads to job loss, homelessness and serious lifelong chronic illness. It affects people regardless of gender, race, creed or economic status. It is caused by exposure to chemicals including, but not limited to, pesticides, mercury, lead, mold and carbon monoxide.

In the US alone, it is estimated that more than 48 million men, women and children suffer adverse health reactions to everyday chemicals as a result of developing MCS, including common triggers like perfumes, colognes, “air fresheners,” and fabric softeners, most of which have known neurotoxins in their ingredients.

Canary Sanctuaries is joining MCS America and other organizations in North America and around the globe to raise awareness during the month of May (MCS Awareness Month). Please visit our website at http://www.canarysanctuaries.org to check out what You can do to make your house of worship more accessible to those with multiple chemical sensitivity.

Brava to Susan! Thank you for your hard work on this issue. I know the website will serve as an important resource for people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, and will inspire people to approach their spiritual leaders about enacting fragrance- and chemical-free policies for their public spaces.

Thanks also to Connie for her active support of this project!

 

Letter to the Editor by Francisca Gutiérrez Clavero, Presidenta Asquifyde.

Dear Susie,

I don’t know if you’ve already heard it, but in Spain we’re busy making a campaign for the recognition of MCS/EHS which we are going to present to the OMS (Organización Mundial de la Salud). For this we are drafting several documents which I attach.

We would appreciate if you would make an entry in your blog and would help us to achieve maximum distribution.

I have attached the following documents:

And I copy the document for joining the Campaign below, for in case you would like The Canary Report to support the Campaign in the field specialized blogs.

Yours sincerely,

Francisca Gutiérrez Clavero
Presidenta Asquifyde
www.asquifyde.es
info@asquifyde.es
Telf. 652669084

TO JOIN TO THE WHO CAMPAIGN 2011

Please forward this email to info@asquifyde.es with your details in the corresponding section of the membership that we provide below:

I AUTHORIZE ASQUIFYDE (State Association of People Affected by Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue, Fibromyalgia and for the Defense of the Environmental Health) TO INCLUDE – MY DATA / OUR DATA- ON THE WRITTEN TO BE ADDRESSED TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE ORGANIZATION WORLD HEALTH, MRS. MARGARET CHAN REQUESTING THE INCLUSION OF MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY AND ELECTRO HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, DERIVED CLASSIFICATIONS AND LISTING OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORK ORGANISATION.

I FURTHER AUTHORIZE ASQUIFYDE (State Association of People Affected by Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue, Fibromyalgia and for the Defense of the Environmental Health) TO INCLUDE – MY OUR DATA / OUR DATA- IN THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO MEPs, POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND ANY OTHER RESPONSIBLE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, BOTH STATEWIDE AND GLOBALLY, SOLICITING TAKE ACTIONS ON HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AS THEY ARE COHERENT PREVENTIVE ACTIONS AGAINST MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY, THE ELECTRO HYPERSENSITIVITY AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DISEASES.

A) PROFESSIONALS:
First name:
Last name:
Profession /position:
Country:
Website:
———————————————————————–
B) PARTNERSHIPS:
Full name of the Association:
Full name of the Representative:
Registration number or ID (if applicable) :
Country:
Website:
—————————————————————————-
C) PLATFORMS
Platform’s Full Name:
Name of person responsible:
Registration number / or ID: (If applicable)
Country:
Website:
—————————————————————————-
D) NGOs
Full Name of the NGO:
Name of Representative:
Registration No. or ID: (If applicable)
Country:
Website:
—————————————————————————–
E) SCIENTIFIC GROUPS:
Full Name of group:
Name of Representative:
Registration number if applicable:
Country:
Website;
—————————————————————————-
F) FOUNDATIONS
Full name of the Foundation:
Name of Representative:
Registration number or ID ( if applicable) :
Country:
Website:
—————————————————————————–

G) OTHERS
(Agencies, Environmental groups, Health Associations, Colleges, Universities, Companies, Corporations, Web Associations, etc.
Full name:
Name of Representative:
Registration Number/ ID if applicable:
Country:
Website:

 

Pardon me… Are you aware of the Fragrance-Free Policy?

Fragrance-Free Zone sign

Sign on the door of the hospital room of a member of The Canary Report community.

This is a sign on the door of the hospital room of a member of The Canary Report community who just had a three-day stay following surgery. He provided three different signs for the staff to choose from, reminding nurses and others about the Fragrance Free Policy. The signs are worded so that staff can use them again for other chemically sensitive patients.

4/26 UPDATE: Here are pdf’s of three signs you are free to use, provided by the person who shared the above sign. Shared with permission. If you share or reprint, be sure to keep intact the copyright info on the signs, thanks!

Pardon Me

Personal Fragrance

Scent Free Zone

Thanks, S.M.!

 

Colorado State Governor John Hickenlooper declares May 2011 as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Awareness Month.

2011 MCS Proclamation Colorado

Download pdf of proclamation.

To learn how to request a proclamation in your state and plan for awareness events, see this informational flyer from MCS America.

 

I’ve been notified that any alternative medical practice, which has opted out of Medicare, will now be prohibited from writing prescriptions, ordering labs, x rays, any tests, or making referrals to another doctor, further marginalizing people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity from a doctor’s care.

Letter to the Editor by Catherine Hollingsworth.

Yesterday I received a call from my metal toxicologist, who is also an MD. She practices at her own alternative medical clinic here in Anchorage. She has been my rock and understands MCS, porphyria and even uses Key Pharmacy in Seattle for glutithione Pall protocol. The subject of this call was that she was notified by Medicare that any alternative medical practice, which has opted out of Medicare, will now be prohibited from writing Rx, ordering labs, x rays, any tests, or making referrals to another doctor.

Needless to say, I am shocked, although I have seen the writing for some time.

At this point, I will be out of thyroid meds, migraine meds, and my protocol in a couple of weeks, and without a doctor to turn to in the state of Alaska. This will begin to impact my “safety net” shortly as I must obtain supporting letters from an Alaska doctor for housing, public assistance and other needs.

I called my care coordinator this morning and told her what was happening to my case, she was stunned at the abruptness of this. After making a call to my doctor herself, the care coordinator confirmed this is so and that I would, indeed, be without a doctor now.

So, I wanted to let you know this has already happened here, apparently, I am the first at this practice to find I couldn’t even get my IMitrex filled and then found the reason for that.

Perhaps you have been aware of this or have others who are being further marginalized from a doctor’s care. Please do let the other canaries know that IF they are currently paying cash for any doctor who has opted out of Medicare, they had better stock up on their Rx’s fast or face a gap without medicine.

Catherine Hollingsworth
Alaska

 

The government launched a public database Friday that allows people to report and search safety complaints on thousands of products — from cribs and toys to power tools and hair dryers.

Contra Costa Times reports that a public database for safety complaints goes live.

WASHINGTON — Despite a last-minute attempt to derail it, the government launched a public database Friday that allows people to report and search safety complaints on thousands of products — from cribs and toys to power tools and hair dryers.

SaferProducts.gov, overseen by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, went live as scheduled over the objections of manufacturers and a stalled GOP effort on Capitol Hill to withhold money for the project until critics’ concerns were addressed.

The database allows people to file reports of injury or potential harm about household products, baby gear and more. In the coming weeks, as consumers file reports with the agency, people will be able to search for safety complaints about specific items they might have in their homes or want to purchase.

“Through SaferProducts.gov, consumers will have open access to product safety information that they have never seen before and the information will empower them to make safer choices,” Inez Tenenbaum, chairman of the consumer safety agency, told The Associated Press.

But manufacturers, congressional Republicans and others charge the public database will be replete with bogus reports and misleading information.

We should flood them with complaints about the toxic chemicals in consumer goods that are severely impacting our health: toxic building materials, electronics, laundry products, fragranced products, household pesticides and cleaning products, mattresses, furniture, fabrics, clothing…

Thanks Linda!

 

The actual number of people poisoned and injured at the Canadian aviation facility is unknown as no one has spent the time to find out. Let’s launch a letter writing campaign to Prime Minister Stephen Harper asking him to help the people who were hurt by this corporate irresponsibility and are now being ignored by the government of Canada.

Help support the aviation workers chemically injured in 2002: Send a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Harper about the lack of justice at the hands of the Labour Program.

Letter by Rob Neis.

Rob Neis

Rob Neis

In the morning hours of March 17, 2002, a hazardous chemical release/exposure incident occurred at an aviation maintenance facility in western Canada. This single incident changed the lives of five people and their families forever.

Safety is self-regulating in aviation companies in Canada. In this case, the company did write investigative reports and submit them to the proper authorities. However, there was important information missing from these reports. The authorities missed that and simply did not respond. As a result, incidents such as what took place on March 17th were allowed to reoccur repeatedly and employees were exposed to these hazardous products without intervention.

The actual number of people poisoned and injured at this facility is unknown as no one has spent the time to find out. During a phone conversation with one injured worker in 2006, a Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) claims adjudicator mentioned the number of disability claims they were dealing with was at 30. Since that time the number of individuals coming forward has grown considerably. Current estimates run between 50 and 70 people who should be on full disability.

I have a letter I’d like to ask readers of The Canary Report to copy and email to the Prime Minister of Canada about the people who were exposed to the toxic chemicals at the aviation facility in 2002, and where there has been no enforcement of existing laws to protect workers. Mistakes were made and as a result people were seriously hurt.

The purpose of the letter is twofold. First, to make the government aware that it is publicly known they made errors while handling this situation. Secondly and more importantly, to get help for the people who were hurt by this corporate irresponsibility and are currently being ignored by the government of Canada.

If you live in Canada, please copy, paste and send the first letter (you’ll find the template below). If you live outside Canada, please use the second letter. Make sure to include your name and address; your phone number is optional.

Please send letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper with a cc to Labour critics Member of Parliament Maria Mina and Member of Parliament Chris Charlton. (Contact info is included in the letters.)

Feel free to send the letter anywhere else you’d like; we do need your support.

Thank you,

Rob Neis
DTOX Radio

~~~

Use this letter if you are a resident of Canada.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2
Fax: 613-941-6900
E-mail: pm@pm.gc.ca

CC:
Member of Parliament Maria Mina
Email: Minna.M@parl.gc.ca

Member of Parliament Chris Charlton
Email: Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca.

Re: Canada Labour Program

Dear Prime Minister Stephen Harper,

I am writing to express extreme dismay about hazardous chemical practices in a self regulated aviation industry that took place at Cascade Aerospace 2002, leaving many permanently ill and unable to work. Because a mistake was made during the initial investigation and never properly addressed by the Labour Program, the injured former employees are unable to receive Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) payments.

After reading the article on the DTOX Radio website, I learned that in March 2002 hazardous chemical products were incorrectly used on a Boeing 737 in the Cascade Aerospace building. Paint stripper was applied with high pressure paint guns, causing the product to become airborne. Several employees become violently ill both in the immediate area and throughout the building. Nine years later, the employees exposed that day remain permanently incapacitated and entirely unsupported by the government of Canada or other relevant agencies.

I used to feel that I lived in a safe and supportive country where my rights AND health were protected. As a Canadian, I am deeply alarmed to learn that my fellow citizens can be severely injured on the work site and left to fend for themselves without appropriate government assistance. I am even more alarmed by the idea of a self regulating industry that clearly doesn’t understand the effects of chemical exposure.

I urge you to right this terrible wrong and revisit the original incident. The remedy for the injured workers continues to be denied due to mistakes that were made by government agencies.

They need your help.

For more information, visit DTOX Radio at http://www.therobnetwork.com/

Sincerely,

[Your name and address (phone number is optional)]

~~~

Use this letter if you live  outside Canada. If you are not in the United States, you will need to change “American” to your nationality in the third paragraph.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2
Fax: 613-941-6900
E-mail: pm@pm.gc.ca

CC:
Member of Parliament Maria Mina
Email: Minna.M@parl.gc.ca

Member of Parliament Chris Charlton
Email: Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca

Re: Canada Labour Program

Dear Prime Minister Stephen Harper,

I am writing to express extreme dismay about hazardous chemical practices in a self regulated aviation industry that took place at Cascade Aerospace 2002, leaving many permanently ill and unable to work. Because a mistake was made during the initial investigation and never properly addressed by the Labour Program, the injured former employees are unable to receive Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) payments.

After reading the article on the DTOX Radio website, I learned that in March 2002 hazardous chemical products were incorrectly used on a Boeing 737 in the Cascade Aerospace building. Paint stripper was applied with high pressure paint guns, causing the product to become airborne. Several employees become violently ill both in the immediate area and throughout the building. Nine years later, the employees exposed that day remain permanently incapacitated and entirely unsupported by the government of Canada or other relevant agencies.

As an American and after reading what you have allowed to happen to your citizens, I don’t find visiting or doing business with your country as appealing as I did before. I am deeply alarmed to learn that you allow your citizens to be severely injured on the work site and left to fend for themselves without appropriate government assistance. I am even more alarmed by the idea of a self regulating industry that clearly doesn’t understand the effects of chemical exposure.

I urge you to right this terrible wrong and revisit the original incident. The remedy for the injured workers continues to be denied due to mistakes that were made by government agencies.

They need your help.

For more information, visit DTOX Radio at http://www.therobnetwork.com/

Sincerely,

[Your name and address (phone number is optional)]

~~~

 

The government is dragging its feet on testing an affordable device that can be used on any existing wood-burning appliance to practically eliminate all particulate pollution.

Chimney with smoke pouring out

The solution to wood smoke pollution is a device which has already been designed and built by Stanford biology professor Dr. Dennis Grahn. It is an “afterburner” which can be used on ANY existing wood-burning appliance, practically eliminates all particulate pollution, and is amazingly affordable (about $350 per unit).


Letter by Marcia Patrice Ganeles-Kislik
.

Dear U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, U.S. Representative Lynn Woolsey, and Assembly Member Jared Huffman,

I am hoping you might be able to help me and millions of other Americans with a huge problem whose solution seems to be totally within our grasp, but held up by needless red tape from the Environmental Protection Agency. The problem is the pollution from wood-burning stoves and fireplaces. I hope I don’t need to inform you of the extreme health hazards, damage to the ozone, etc. etc. of wood smoke—all of which is well documented and not even debatable.

The solution is a device which has already been designed and built by a Stanford biology professor named Dr. Dennis Grahn. It is an “afterburner” which can be used on ANY existing wood-burning appliance, practically eliminates all particulate pollution, and is amazingly affordable (about $350 per unit).

The problem is that the EPA will not test an after-market accessory that can be used on an older, non-EPA phase II woodburner. The EPA will only consider certification for complete wood burning systems. This is great for the manufacturers of wood stoves, but is a true tragedy for all of us whose lives are being literally shortened by living in areas where wood smoke is killing us. This is an outrage and we need someone with power and influence to take the reins and cut through this asinine red tape. This device promises to do so much, not only for the health of millions of Americans, but for the planet itself, that it simply MUST be addressed. This device could put many Americans back to work, fabricating and installing the device. It is truly a win-win for everyone!

There was a short article about this invention in the S.F. Chronicle on Feb. 27, 2009. Dr. Grahn is anxious to hear from anyone who might help get this off the ground. His email address is dagrahn@Stanford.edu. He can explain more clearly the red tape preventing this from happening. I am just an advocate for clean air who is hoping, along with many others, that someone in Washington can do the right thing. Please consider having someone work on this potentially beneficial project. I think your constituents would be very pleased.

Thank you for your time.

Marcia Patrice Ganeles-Kislik

~~~

Have something you’d like to say? Readers of The Canary Report can use this link to Submit a Letter to the Editor.

Photo credit.

 

I can only describe the experience of living with this smart meter on my home as a living nightmare that never ends.

Letter by Susan B.

I am disabled and cannot travel. If I could do so, I would like to tell the California Public Utilities Commission CPUC the following:

My name is Susan B, I reside at xxxxxxxxx La Mesa, CA, USA. I have had an smart meter on my home, on the bedroom wall, right near my headboard and my side of the bed, since May, 2011, placed there by San Diego Gas and Electric, for the purpose of reading my electrical usage. I am 59 years old and a recently retired teacher and volunteer director of a national nonprofit, the Center for School Mold Help. I am 100% disabled, with an immune system and lung disorder. My home had previously been the safest place for me to rest and repair my immune system, per my physician orders.

I can only describe the experience of living with this smart meter on my home (and the ones in the neighborhood and beyond) as a living nightmare that never ends. My health has deteriorated significantly, in ways that are consistent with rf radiation illness, none of which I have had before the smart meter, including: ringing ears that almost never quit, sometimes to the point of severe pain; headaches on a continuous basis, sometimes sinus pain and inflammation to the point of crying most of the day from the pain; heart palpitations; dizziness, mental confusion and memory problems; a strong feeling of pressure in the head, followed by pain, when in the room where the smart meter is located. I have also, very disturbingly, developed electromagnetic sensitivities, which I did not have before either. This means that I cannot use a cell phone, computer, DECT phone set, and WIFI or be in the presence of these without shielding. The master bedroom can no longer be used by me. Even though I am disabled and do not have a lot of money, I have had to spend at least $2000 to try to shield myself and change out items in my home to follow physician advice. The shielding is not working well enough and my daily life and that of my family is severely disrupted.

I have lost the health I was regaining by being in my home and recuperating, and we have lost the use of the master bedroom and a portion of our yard, as we do not dare go near the smart meter. On two occasions, outside, I did, and suffered a severe sinus headache that lasted for days. I have asked San Diego Gas and Electric to remove the smart meter and they refuse. CPUC has denied that it could be a health problem. I am frightened and angry that the CPUC has authorized the installment of these dangerous devices. I know that these devices have ruined my health and all quality of life. I know that smart meters are ruining California. I recommend that all businesses and travelers avoid California until these meters are removed. My physician is very alarmed and even his requests have been ignored by SDGE and CPUC.

I feel like I am living in Nazi Germany or in Russia, during the Stalin era, being tortured daily by government action. I know of many others with these complaints now, and am very, very frightened for myself, for Californians, and for my country. I have nowhere to go to escape these meters and am very fearful that the signals may be turned up, per the SDGE plan I read about. I fear for all the living beings in this mesh network, including humans – especially the most susceptible, children, the elderly, the disabled; animals, and our plant life. We could disrupt life so excessively that we cease to exist on the planet, with this horrific, poorly conceived plan that has ignored current science. Examination of the smart meters in CA shows that there is severe danger, including DNA breaks and inability to repair DNA, cancer development, neurological problems, and leakage from the blood-brain barrier.

STOP THE DEPLOYMENTS. ALLOW OPTING OUT IMMEDIATELY FOR THOSE WITH HEALTH COMPLAINTS OR CONCERNS. REVOKE AUTHORIZATION FOR WIRELESS METERS AND ISSUE AN ORDER TO REMOVE ALL THOSE INSTALLED, IMMEDIATELY. EXPLORE THE OPTION, CAREFULLY, OF FIBEROPTIC OPTIONS.

I ASK GOVERNOR BROWN TO HELP WITH AN IMMEDIATE EXECUTIVE ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Susan B.
La Mesa, CA

~~~

Have something you’d like to say? Readers of The Canary Report can use this link to Submit a Letter to the Editor.

©2008-2012 The Canary Report Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha