October 2011-- During the next six months, The Canary Report will be dedicated solely to me sharing my experiences while on the Gupta Amygdala Retraining program for MCS. If you'd like to be notified by email when blog entries are made, please subscribe in the right hand column below. During the entire six months, this blog will remain online but Our Canary Report network and forum will be offline and inaccessible to our members. Thank you for all your support! Aloha, Susie
 

This is the fourth and final post in a series about my move to Barrhaven. (After this, I’ll be blogging about my life at Barrhaven.)

By contributor Linda Sepp.

My new front door.

Making new friends.

I’ve hung up a bird feeder and made friends with a chipmunk and a couple of black squirrels. One of my neighbours has some similar interests as I do and we’ve been able to spend a little time in each other’s company, mostly talking while sitting out on the stoops. The air is sometimes safe enough to do so, and for me to take little walks in the side yard. She picks up my mail from the building it is delivered to, as the laundry product residues in the lobby were making me really sick, even if I went only twice a week. And she took me on my 1st trip to Ottawa the other day, to check out two farmers markets and an environmentally friendly products store (where I was hoping to be able to get some safe toilet paper from, but they were sold out). I was able to actually appreciate some of that trip, beyond merely surviving it, despite the pain from cell towers, traffic, and other exposures. I am not in a hurry to do it again, but know that I could manage a trip every now and again with someone else driving, and as long as I don’t go inside anywhere. Ottawa has some nice sights and places to see for better days ahead.

Close up of the sign on my door.

Passing storm out my window.

My health continues to improve here (it hit a wall at the cabin, despite the fresh outdoor air and good well water I got from my friends, all of which I do miss). I hope I can get another stage of water filtration installed, as what is here now isn’t enough for me to be able to drink it. The RO water I’m getting delivered is also not great, but better than the double filtered tap water. There is no spring water available in glass bottles around here, and it’s too far to drive to get filled myself.

My remaining challenges her aren’t life threatening, (as long as the lack of some of my supplements and toilet paper doesn’t become so ;-p) and can be dealt with over time. I feel pretty good about being here (when I’m not missing the wilderness) and feel fairly confident that I can continue to improve my health and brain function. Some of my old self is returning, and most of my PTSD is gone! I have my collection of odd treasures around me, many which make me smile when I see them. I have my knife sharpener and pots and pans so I can cook well again. I have an oven again (which I got sick burning off fragrance residues from) so I can bake veggies and gluten free bread soon, I can hand feed a chipmunk, watch some flowers grow, and I have some nice neighbours. It’s feeling like a safe enough home. Life is good.

The sun came out after the storm, just in time for sunset...

~~~

Linda blogs at Life with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A search for safe housing, where this series is originally published: part one, part two, part three, part four.

 

The film Homesick, now in post-production, is the first documentation of  the long-term impact of healthier housing on people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.

Letter to the Editor by Susan Abod, filmmaker.

Susan Abod

I’m excited to report that I’ve launched a campaign on Indegogo to fund the post production for my documentary film on MCS and housing “Homesick”– many years in the making.

Please visit my campaign at:

http://www.indiegogo.com/Homesick-2

Susan Abod

~~~

Info from Susan Abod’s website:

To film Homesick, Susan hit the road with her camerawoman, learning how people around the country who live with MCS find safe housing. She interviewed people from all walks of life; their living quarters ranged from a house on stilts to tents and a teepee. Filmed over a period of ten years, the film now includes follow-up interviews with the original subjects. The trailer has been screened at the Santa Fe Film Center and at the Santa Fe Center For Contemporary Art’s Megabytes 4 Festival, and has been viewed over 200,000 times on the Homesick website. Homesick is currently in post-production, with a 64-minute rough cut. We’re almost there, but we need $6,000 to record the soundtrack and complete the post-production for the film. We need your help for Susan to complete her epic journey!

WHY YOU SHOULD CARE
Homesick gives a human face to a growing environmental peril, and it is the first documentation of  the long-term impact of healthier housing on people with MCS. Safe, healthy housing is the primary health-care need of people living with MCS. It’s almost inevitable that anyone with significant chemical sensitivities will be either homeless or live in substandard housing at some point. Many people become homeless while searching for safe housing, and more than a few commit suicide as a direct result of not having access to safe housing. Finding or creating a safe home environment is extremely challenging, since most people with MCS have had to stop working and have limited financial resources. The impact of this film is not limited to those who suffer from MCS, because unhealthy housing affects us all. Lives may be lost if we do not finish this film.

 

Realtors who encourage sellers to do cheap renovations are contributing to a multitude of illnesses and unhealthy living conditions inside a “home.”

Letter to the Editor by Molly Brown.

As someone who suffers from chemical sensitivities, I am enraged at what is happening here in Vancouver, BC, Canada, in the overpriced housing market. It’s what I call “the cheap plastic condo.” This is the only affordable housing here as house prices start at $700,000 in the Greater Vancouver Regional District. (Otherwise you are looking at a 2-hour plus commute in traffic).

Unfortunately, before condos even go on the market, realtors advise sellers to put in cheap flooring, cheap bathrooms, and cheap kitchens. Then, they douse the condo in cheap air freshener prior to any open house.

The asking price per typical condo? $350,000 plus. And not even real wood floors. Vinyl siding, laminate flooring, pressboard kitchens, cheap smelly appliances, vinyl tiles, open gas fireplace. I think that if I were to test some of these new apartments, the formaldehyde content would probably be as high as FEMA trailers! Sadly, I think that realtors are especially responsible, since they are the ones telling sellers to do these cheap renovations.

The Canadian Real Estate Association has yet to respond to my emails sent to them regarding this. Realtors need to be aware that what they are doing is contributing to what causes a multitude of illnesses and unhealthy living conditions inside a “home.”

Please, realtors, stop the “cheap plastic condo” – I just need a place to live!

Molly Brown
Vancouver, BC, Canada

 

“Knowing you have a right to accessibility is very different from being able to get that accessibility, especially when you are dependent on people’s good will and you have no guarantee that the future will not bring new chemical injuries.” –Client of the Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation, Canada

The Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation reports on a client trying to find environmentally safe housing. CERA is a not-for-profit in Canada (offices in Toronto and Ottawa) established to ensure that human rights protections in housing are effective for low income households and to address systemic barriers to accessing affordable accommodation.

These are the experiences of one of our clients, Jane, who lives with environmental sensitivities and has been struggling to find safe housing.

I had no idea that when I started experiencing increasing migraines, sudden weight gain, rashes, coughing, IBS, difficulty concentrating, irritability, and other symptoms at work, that I was developing MCS/ES. Very small amounts of chemicals found in fabric softener, air freshener, perfume, scented personal care products, detergents, pesticides and more, were toxic to my body — chemically injuring the organs of my body. At first, I would be fine when I returned home, but over many months, the exposures to chemicals caused chronic MCS/ES and my home was no longer safe. I needed, what is known in human rights as “a scent-free/chemical avoidance” environment. And so I began the search for safe housing.

My first attempt was completely unsuccessful, mainly because it takes a great deal of research to know what is safe and what is not safe. I can tell you now that living near ‘brownfield’ remediation is not safe, living near a major street or highway is not safe; neighbours using fabric softener, detergents like Tide or Gain and venting these chemicals out of hot dryers; pesticide use in the neighbourhood, industry, rail lines and gas stations nearby; and the list goes on. Also, the house, itself, was not safe. Air freshener residue is very hard, if not impossible, to remove; products such as laminate and carpets ‘off-gas’; mold can make life impossible; and, again, the list goes on.

Read full report.

Thanks, Linda!

 

Imagine my surprise when two weeks ago I received a phone call saying a unit had become available at Barrhaven, one of the specially built units that have the potential to meet most of my housing needs!

By contributor Linda Sepp.

Linda standing in the woods with a cap on.

This photo was taken the day before my birthday last July, after being at the cabin about three weeks.

It’s already June, over a year since I was forced from my previous home without another place to go to due to my disabling medical condition of severe Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, Environmental Sensitivities, Fibromyalgia, and Electro HyperSensitivity, none of which is properly recognized in this country. It’s almost a year since I (barely) made it to the summer cabin owned by some in my family. And half a year since my father passed away.

Despite a lot of struggle, I made it though winter with the help of a local woman and her family, some assistance from several canaries, a few friends in Toronto, and my uncle’s wife in Massachusetts (who had been paying the electric bill for the cabin for years and continued with my winter heating costs), as well as the hopes and prayers of many. I’m eternally grateful.

Little bear on hind legs, one paw out steadying himself on the screen door, looking right at camera.

Yearling bear climbing on the hand railing beside the door at the cabin.

I also was blessed by the visits of a young screech owl, wild turkeys, numerous other birds, squirrels, chipmunks, and for a short time some young raccoon siblings. I’ve learned a lot from these creatures and will treasure the photos I was able to take, as otherwise the memories would likely be lost in brain fog. The other night I was visited by a bear, a yearling, who was looking for food, alone. I got a blurry photo of him as he was about to climb on the hand railing beside the door to eat the moths circling around the light.

My challenges at the cabin have been great. No running water, no indoor toilet, no fresh organic food close enough to get for myself and too far for others to drive regularly, no insulation, no proper storage for the things I couldn’t have near me but needed to live, inadequate winter clothing, getting snowed in, and more challenges that should not be endured by anyone in a rich country like Canada, especially those with disabilities.

Through the course of it all, I discovered my situation does not fit into any official safety net mandate. There are only seven medically required housing units built for people with environmental sensitivities in Canada. I’ve been on a wait list since 2006, maybe 2007. Meanwhile, I’ve gone from a moldy home to an apartment balcony, and spent winter in a summer cabin. But despite the healing effects of the external environment at the cabin, I’ve lived here with the threat of being forcefully removed by a certain member of the family. The need to find a safer place has been a constant worry.

So imagine my surprise when two weeks ago I received a phone call saying a unit had become available in Barrhaven, one of the specially built units that had the potential to meet most of my housing needs! They wanted to know if would I please go there within a week and spend a night or two to see if it was actually suitable for me (people with MCS/ES are affected by different things, and some people are not able to tolerate the materials in these units, or the noise of the air handling system).

I actually cried for two days, mostly since the location is in the middle of a suburb that has grown around it since it was built and I thought for sure I would lose my ability to go outside for fresh air because of the toxic laundry product fumes from neighbourhood dryer vents, a problem I’ve had previously. Being able to be outside here at the cabin– to witness the seasons, the wildlife, and most especially to breathe the fresh air– has been so important to my recovery. The idea of being locked inside again was devastating! I had my heart set on finding a place near the middle of nowhere, where I could plant an organic garden and to try to be as self sufficient as possible, since finding people with the time and inclination to help is sometimes impossible. So this came as a shock to me!

Yet despite the initial disappointment , I was ready to jump at the opportunity to have a safe enough home to live in, one with safe running water, indoor toilet, places to put things I couldn’t be in the same room with safely, a home where I wouldn’t be threatened with having to leave without much more than a moment’s notice, a home where the structure wasn’t falling apart, a home where I could heal the trauma of living under siege for so many years. But first I had to find help to make the trip to check out the unit.

I am blessed that my friend (guardian angel and lifesaver) here was able to re-arrange her plans in order to drive me there and back, and able to find places in the Ottawa area to spend those two nights, as staying with me there was not an option. There aren’t many people in the world who would do something like this for someone they barely know! She is truly an extraordinary and special woman.

Preparing and packing for the three-day trip was difficult: food and water, my cot, my cooking utensils, toilet paper and other essentials needed to be taken. Then the day came, and three hours into the trip I was so sick I thought I wasn’t going to make it. I had to ask to stop, got out and was barely able to walk around, trying to get some air. As we continued, the highway got bigger and busier, and cell towers started appearing at the sides of the road, sending piercing pains through my head. Things were not looking good.

We eventually arrived there, about four hours after leaving the cabin. It was very strange to be in a place with so many other people again. “My” unit was at the very end, with trees and a grassy area between the building and the train tracks, and there was a small shared garden and patio stone area in front with a tall evergreen hedge between this area and the baseball field on the other side. It was not as bad as I feared it could be.

Linda in her new housing unit, looking right at camera, behin dher the walls are bare with ventilation ducts running along the ceiling.

Testing out my new home!

Inside reminded me of an Ikea loft. Polished concrete, bricks, and wood paneling. I was perplexed by the lack of kitchen cabinets. Apparently mold was a worry so none were installed. I’ve lived with open shelving before, and things get dusty and greasy, so this was a concern. The air wasn’t too bad though, although it seemed the Heat Recovery Ventilation was pushing some fragrance through it. That was disappointing as the air could have been better filtered.

I was able to determine that there wasn’t anything life-threatening there, so it would be ok to remain overnight alone after removing the CFL bulbs that I could and replacing them with regular bulbs my friend went out to buy for me (which I had to scrub down to remove the fabric softener contamination from!). We made plans with my friend that she’d drop by the next afternoon to see how I was doing. I unpacked a few things and made a cuppa coffee! (Fair-trade and organic of course.)

The coffee revived me a bit, and I felt strong enough to go outside and look around. I wanted to see who my neighbours would be, and was able to meet the ones on my side of the building. I went back inside my possible new home, knowing a little more about the area, and settled in. When I felt a bit better, I started exploring. I was surprised and pleased that I was able to do this, after a long trip and all the exposures! I found several storage areas that did not quite agree with me, so I kept those doors shut. But the main living room and kitchen area were fine for me! The air system though was very noisy. So noisy that I hardly heard a train go by 50 feet away, and I hardly heard the airplanes flying directly overhead. Paradise not. But the air in the living area was good. I was not getting any sicker or feeling any worse. And this was a great sign!

I dragged my cot and bedding upstairs and set it up in the small bedroom with my little portable air purifier. There was something not quite right in the larger bedroom but not life threatening; I thought of ways to work with what was there, with what I needed, and what I was capable of doing to make it work. This was promising!

When I woke up the next morning and wasn’t completely dragging ass, I knew I’d be ok there, that I’d found my next home! As long as water filtration is installed, I believe I can make it work. And if I can find safe containers to grow food in, and certified organic soil around Ottawa, then I could even grow some herbs and greens there!

That first morning in my next home, I sat to meditate, and prayed for help to heal and release much of the trauma I’ve been carrying around. I’d brought my laptop and the DVD of my father’s memorial service, and as I sat on the little stool I’d brought, I realized it was exactly six months since he’d passed away. Bittersweet. If I could change anything, it would be that he’d have had the peace to see me settled in a safe home. I move there at the end of the month. I think some of those earlier tears were tears of relief.

I’m back at the cabin now and focusing on what I need to do in preparation for my move to Barrhaven:
• Find a safe and reputable long distance moving company to move my things from storage in Toronto to my new home near Ottawa, and hope the Ontario Disability Support Program will cover the actual cost.
• Find help to get myself and my things from the cabin to Barrhaven.
• Find a new all-metal top loading washer and dryer, and funding source to acquire them.
• Find a safe shower curtain (oh to be able to have a safe shower or bath when I need one!).
• Find help to put my old car in for a check-up and renew my license plate before I go.

Oh to have a home again! A home where I am not threatened by other people or their product use! A home where I can heal.

~~~

Linda blogs at Life with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A search for safe housing, where this post is originally published.

 

Most new clothing and fabrics are permeated with toxic chemicals during manufacturing, which can be a real problem for people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. Ellen from Toronto, Canada, shares her decontamination protocol.

Laundry on line
Reprinted with permission.

Editor’s note: Linda Sepp posted Ellen’s Laundry Decontamination Protocol on our private network in 2009; I’m reprinting here on The Canary Report public blog for easy access to everyone. Many thanks to Ellen for permission to reprint. ~Susie

ELLEN’S LAUNDRY DECONTAMINATION PROTOCOL

Some warnings before you start:

  1. Do not use this protocol on silk. Please note that I have only tested this protocol on cotton, cotton/bamboo blends, cotton/polyester blends, and a very few totally synthetic fabrics. It is not safe to use on silk. Silk should be washed only with mild low pH liquids, such as hair shampoo or diluted natural vinegar. Alkaline agents can destroy silk, so don’t use baking soda or washing soda on silk.
  2. Clothing may stretch or shrink as a result of this protocol. As far as I can tell, the milk soaking, to remove formaldehyde, is the stage at which fabrics can change shape. As a result, I now use no more than 1/4 cup skim milk powder in a full bin of water, instead of the 1/2 cup (or more) skim milk powder that I used to include in that step.
  3. Wear safe gloves to protect your hands while handling the solutions. Wear a mask or respirator if you are sensitive to the chemicals in the clothes or to the soaking media.
  4. Unfortunately, I have had poor results when attempting to decontaminate clothes that had been dried hundreds of times with dryer sheets, such as Bounce or Snuggles. I am not sure there are any safe chemical solutions capable of dissolving the toxic chemical residues from those products. The protocol doesn’t damage the clothes, but it also doesn’t remove enough of the Bounce residue to make them safe for me to be around.

The Protocol

I use large or small plastic (polyethylene or polystyrene) bins for this, depending on the volume of fabric I am detoxing, and mix whatever amount seems right into the bin of filtered water. Other people have recommended using enameled metal pots, but I don’t have any in the size I would need, so I use some plastic bins I originally bought for storing clothes. These bins fit well into a pair of kitchen sinks conveniently located several metres from my washer and dryer. For very large items, I use large bins that fit into the pair of laundry sinks located very close to my washer.

One thing I didn’t clue into right away is the importance of rinsing well, sometimes rinsing several times, after each soaking, to remove everything that the detoxing liquid has pulled out. When I am detoxing heavy items, such as towels or sheets, I do the rinsing in my washing machine, with a bit of vinegar in the fabric softener compartment to minimize the amount of chlorine that ends up on the machine-rinsed fabrics. Because of worse shoulder and hand pain, I have recently also been tending to rinse clothes in the washer after each soaking. My strategy is to soak one or more garments of identical or similar colour in each of the 2 bins that fit into my basement divided kitchen sink. Decontaminating by colour, I can rinse all the items in the washer at the same time without worrying about dye exchanges. As always,I add vinegar to the fabric softener compartment of the washer, to knock out the chlorine in the rinse water. For smaller items, I used to be able to rinse out the soaking item fairly well by using clear filtered water, squeezing the items gently, pouring the rinse water down the drain, adding more filtered water to the container, squeezing gently, repeating as many times as necessary for the rinse water to turn clear.

The measurements I list are for soaking items in small bins about 3 gallons in capacity. For soaking in washing machines (not practical for me), the correct quantities are probably double what I list.

My usual order of soakings, inspired by several postings on the MCS-CanadianSources support group, but adapted by me, is:

  1. Sea salt (or table salt) in filtered water, about 1/4 cup salt to many cups of filtered water, as many as it takes to dissolve all the salt, to help lock the dye into the fabric. TSP soaking, which used to be my first soaking step, is especially good at removing dye from fabrics, not always a good thing. I have recently started using a salt soaking as the first step for all fabrics, even those not dyed. It seems to help with decontamination as well, although I have no idea why. But white clothes I decontaminated without a salt soaking retained more odours by the time I had finished all the steps, so I started soaking them in salt as well. Salt is sold in boxes or in bulk at many supermarkets, grocery stores, and health food stores, so it’s an easy ingredient to obtain.
  2. TSP (tri-sodium phosphate, real, not substitute). If you can use hot water for this, all the better, since TSP seems to work best in hot water. But choose a water temperature suitable for your clothes. I mix about 1/4 cup TSP into very hot water, then add sufficient cold filtered tap water to bring the mixture to the required temperature for soaking the fabric. With towels and sheets, I use hot water, as I do all my machine washing of towels and sheets in hot water anyway, because of my dust mite allergies. So I don’t bother to use cold water when detoxing them in TSP. However, most of my clothes have labels warning that the water temperature should be either cool or cold. So I add lots of cold water to the hot water and TSP for those items. TSP is often sold in powder form in paint sections of hardware stores because it is a good de-greaser for preparing walls for painting. TSP is able to dissolve out oily chemicals in fabrics. If you can’t tolerate this product, then please skip this step.
  3. Milk (apparently this helps get out formaldehyde). I mix about 1/4 cup skim milk powder into a plastic bin full of cold water. Other people dilute whatever form of milk they normally drink, e.g., 2 % fat content, in water. I prefer to use powdered skim milk, rather than liquid milk, for the simple reason that I can store the powder where I do the laundry decontamination, in my basement, rather than having to go upstairs each time I need more milk. Also, the milk we currently buy, organic whole milk (3.8% milk fat) for making wonderful lactose-free homemade yogurt [for the Specific Carbohydrate diet], is very expensive compared to the skim-milk powder. Some people use more than 1/2 cup milk for this step, but I have found 1/4 cup to be a reasonable amount that doesn’t reshape my clothes. I usually do the milk soak for less than 24 hours, to prevent the milk from spoiling. And I always make sure the lid of the container is on tightly, to keep out curious, milk-loving felines who could be poisoned by the formaldehyde and other chemicals absorbed by the milk. I buy the powdered skim milk at a supermarket.
  4. Grain vinegar (I use President’s Choice brand. I think that Heinz vinegar in the USA is similar). 1/2 cup in a bin of cold water. I think that the vinegar reacts with alkaline contaminants in the fabric, to neutralize them, but I’m not positive of the chemistry. President’s Choice vinegar is sold at “National Grocery” stores in Canada, such as Loblaw’s, Zehr’s, and Fortinos supermarkets. Heinz vinegar is available at all supermarkets I have checked. Try not to use a vinegar that is made from petroleum products.
  5. Borax and washing soda, or if I can’t find scent-free washing soda (fragrance either deliberately added by manufacturer or contamination in store), borax and baking soda, plus a bit of powder oxygen bleach. This combination was devised by LaVerne, a genius who is a moderator of this list, and from whom I have learned a lot about clothing decontamination. LaVerne came up with the recipe to mimic the action of an AFM product that is scarce and very expensive in Canada. If you can’t tolerate baking soda, you might want to use the AFM product, whatever it is. Mix 1/4 cup borax with hot water to dissolve, then add 1/4 cup washing soda or 1/4 cup baking soda plus 1-2 teaspoons powdered oxygen bleach, and enough cold filtered tap water to dissolve all of these ingredients. Borax and washing soda are sold in the (contaminated) laundry detergent aisles of supermarkets. But some non-toxic stores also sell these products in bulk. Baking soda is usually found in the baking products section or the bulk foods aisles of supermarkets and other food stores.
  6. If the fabrics still smell, I soak them in a very weak solution of rubbing alcohol (99% isopropyl alcohol, 1/4 cup-1/2 cup in bin of water). LaVerne is the genius who thought of this as well. Some chemicals are soluble in alcohol. I usually buy the 99% isopropyl alcohol in 500-ml bottles at pharmacies, but I wish I could find larger bottles, as I go through them fairly quickly.
  7. Machine wash with non-toxic laundry detergent, using vinegar in the fabric softener compartment to neutralize chlorine and to soften. Typically I will wash checking the smell after each washing, until I am satisfied that I will be able to wear or use the item safely. At that point, I dry the items in our electric dryer, or else dry them on a rack or clothesline, depending on the manufacturer’s recommendations. Examples of the laundry detergent I use are Simply Clean (a Canadian company) and Seventh Generation Free & Clear. I tend to do the first washing with Simply Clean, because of its alcohol content. So far, I have not reacted to Seventh Generation Free & Clear 2X liquid, and I hope I never do.

Repeat all steps if required. So, I allow at least a week to detox every new item of clothing or fabric I buy.

Hope this helps.

Ellen
Toronto, Canada

Photo credit

 

The government launched a public database Friday that allows people to report and search safety complaints on thousands of products — from cribs and toys to power tools and hair dryers.

Contra Costa Times reports that a public database for safety complaints goes live.

WASHINGTON — Despite a last-minute attempt to derail it, the government launched a public database Friday that allows people to report and search safety complaints on thousands of products — from cribs and toys to power tools and hair dryers.

SaferProducts.gov, overseen by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, went live as scheduled over the objections of manufacturers and a stalled GOP effort on Capitol Hill to withhold money for the project until critics’ concerns were addressed.

The database allows people to file reports of injury or potential harm about household products, baby gear and more. In the coming weeks, as consumers file reports with the agency, people will be able to search for safety complaints about specific items they might have in their homes or want to purchase.

“Through SaferProducts.gov, consumers will have open access to product safety information that they have never seen before and the information will empower them to make safer choices,” Inez Tenenbaum, chairman of the consumer safety agency, told The Associated Press.

But manufacturers, congressional Republicans and others charge the public database will be replete with bogus reports and misleading information.

We should flood them with complaints about the toxic chemicals in consumer goods that are severely impacting our health: toxic building materials, electronics, laundry products, fragranced products, household pesticides and cleaning products, mattresses, furniture, fabrics, clothing…

Thanks Linda!

 

The government is dragging its feet on testing an affordable device that can be used on any existing wood-burning appliance to practically eliminate all particulate pollution.

Chimney with smoke pouring out

The solution to wood smoke pollution is a device which has already been designed and built by Stanford biology professor Dr. Dennis Grahn. It is an “afterburner” which can be used on ANY existing wood-burning appliance, practically eliminates all particulate pollution, and is amazingly affordable (about $350 per unit).


Letter by Marcia Patrice Ganeles-Kislik
.

Dear U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, U.S. Representative Lynn Woolsey, and Assembly Member Jared Huffman,

I am hoping you might be able to help me and millions of other Americans with a huge problem whose solution seems to be totally within our grasp, but held up by needless red tape from the Environmental Protection Agency. The problem is the pollution from wood-burning stoves and fireplaces. I hope I don’t need to inform you of the extreme health hazards, damage to the ozone, etc. etc. of wood smoke—all of which is well documented and not even debatable.

The solution is a device which has already been designed and built by a Stanford biology professor named Dr. Dennis Grahn. It is an “afterburner” which can be used on ANY existing wood-burning appliance, practically eliminates all particulate pollution, and is amazingly affordable (about $350 per unit).

The problem is that the EPA will not test an after-market accessory that can be used on an older, non-EPA phase II woodburner. The EPA will only consider certification for complete wood burning systems. This is great for the manufacturers of wood stoves, but is a true tragedy for all of us whose lives are being literally shortened by living in areas where wood smoke is killing us. This is an outrage and we need someone with power and influence to take the reins and cut through this asinine red tape. This device promises to do so much, not only for the health of millions of Americans, but for the planet itself, that it simply MUST be addressed. This device could put many Americans back to work, fabricating and installing the device. It is truly a win-win for everyone!

There was a short article about this invention in the S.F. Chronicle on Feb. 27, 2009. Dr. Grahn is anxious to hear from anyone who might help get this off the ground. His email address is dagrahn@Stanford.edu. He can explain more clearly the red tape preventing this from happening. I am just an advocate for clean air who is hoping, along with many others, that someone in Washington can do the right thing. Please consider having someone work on this potentially beneficial project. I think your constituents would be very pleased.

Thank you for your time.

Marcia Patrice Ganeles-Kislik

~~~

Have something you’d like to say? Readers of The Canary Report can use this link to Submit a Letter to the Editor.

Photo credit.

 

This is a great resource for people new to Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, and for all of us to share with friends family!

A dual kitchen-laundry room with a box of laundry detergent and other cleaning supplies.

It looks like this dual purpose kitchen-laundry room could use some help with eliminating toxic products. Can you imagine cooking food next to that laundry detergent? They need the Environmental Working Group's Healthy Home Checklist!

 

As usual, the Environmental Working Group is on the same page as people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity:

Have you ever given your house a once-over for environmental health? The Environmental Working Group’s Healthy Home Checklist is a quick and effective way to get a sense of what changes are most important — and how to make them (if you haven’t already!). Working from this kind of list can add perspective to the seemingly endless toxic updates we hear in the news.

Ready to create an eco-healthy home?

We created this Healthy Home Checklist for you to use as you walk through your home — and open your bathroom cabinet, look under your sink, and check those laundry supplies. It’s an easy, hands-on way to create a less toxic environment for your family. When you’re done, you’ll breathe easier (literally!) knowing that you’ve tackled the toxics that matter most in your home.

Before you get started, get the basics from EWG’s Vice President for Research, Jane Houlihan, who helped a Maryland family identify the toxic chemicals in their home on this televised home visit:

Check your house for common toxic chemicals and choose safer alternatives with this simple checklist for less toxic living.

Getting together with family for Thanksgiving? Give everyone a copy of the checklist!

Link to Environmental Working Group‘s home page.

Photo credit.

 

Allowing someone with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity to work at home may be a reasonable accommodation when the person’s disability prevents successfully performing the job on-site.

Looking through French doors into a home office.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said that allowing an individual with a disability to work at home may be a form of reasonable accommodation.

 

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has a great info sheet on Work At Home: Telework as a Reasonable Accommodation. I have been lucky enough to have this type of accommodation provided to me thanks to the very cooperative employer. As a writer, this type of accommodation works perfectly for both my employer and me because all incoming assignments and outgoing work can be transmitted through telecommunications.

In its 1999 Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (revised 10/17/02), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said that allowing an individual with a disability to work at home may be a form of reasonable accommodation. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodation for qualified applicants and employees with disabilities. Reasonable accommodation is any change in the work environment or in the way things are customarily done that enables an individual with a disability to apply for a job, perform a job, or gain equal access to the benefits and privileges of a job. The ADA does not require an employer to provide a specific accommodation if it causes undue hardship, i.e., significant difficulty or expense.

Not all persons with disabilities need – or want – to work at home. And not all jobs can be performed at home. But, allowing an employee to work at home may be a reasonable accommodation where the person’s disability prevents successfully performing the job on-site and the job, or parts of the job, can be performed at home without causing significant difficulty or expense.

Click here for the EEOC fact sheet explaining the ways that employers may use existing telework programs or allow an individual to work at home as a reasonable accommodation.

Here is some additional information about The ADA: Your Employment Rights as an Individual With a Disability and Job Applicants and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

All kinds of info about disability discrimination here.

If you have Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and need accommodations in the workplace, the ADA laws and EEOC provide great guidelines if your employer is cooperative and willing to provide accommodations. Unfortunately, the laws are weak and pretty much useless if your employer is not willing to provide anything for you. If your employer or perspective employer is unwilling to provide accommodations, it can be a really tough fight for you to secure your disability rights even with legal representation. We have members in our community who have been let go from their jobs simply because the employer did not want to bother with providing a safe, nontoxic work environment. It’s very sad when that happens and can lead to untold suffering and hardship when the person cannot secure another job. That said, we do have many people in our canary community who have asked for, often pressed for, and received accommodations at their workplace, so I always encourage people disabled by MCS to try to work with their employer to secure accommodations.

A great resource to support you in working with your employer on accommodations is the wonderful website and staff at the Job Accommodations Network. They have specific informational pages dedicated to Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and workplace accommodations. Take a look at these two posts for more information about JAN: Chemical sensitivities in the workplace and Workers rights and chemical sensitivity.

Photo credit.

©2008-2012 The Canary Report Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha