Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and Social Security Disability, Part 3
Posted on Jul 22, 2009 by Susie Collins in Blog, Disability Rights, MCS, Michael Walkup
If you are unable to do your regular job, the Social Security Administration will define how much work you can do based on medical opinions, and plug you into the “Grid” to make their determination.
Post by Michael Walkup, attorney at law.
This is Part 3 on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and Social Security Disability.
This post was revised on 7/27.
Step 5: Vocational (continued from Part 2)
It used to be that the Social Security Administration had a vocational expert and each and every hearing. Vocational experts are people who are experts on jobs. Many of them do job placement for workers compensation insurance carriers. Not only was it expensive to have a live expert at each hearing, but the opinions varied widely. This is not an exact science.
To solve these problems, SSA promulgated regulations in 1978, which set up criteria to be followed to analyze vocational issues. The results were put together in a chart, which looked like a spreadsheet and quickly came to be known as the “Grid.” Under the Grid certain questions are asked, which are: (1) How old is the claimant? (2) How far did the claimant get in school? (3) Does the claimant have any skills? (4) Are any of those skills transferable to lighter work? And, (5) how much physical work can the claimant do despite the impairment or impairments?
In terms of “age,” the only point where that is really considered for most people is if they are over 50. If you are under 50, you have to be unable to do all forms of work. They then proceed in five year increments so there is one category if you are 50 to 55, another if you are 55 to 60 and the final one if you are between 60 and 65. If you are within six months of the next category, you can be bumped up.
For “education,” again there are categories. The first is “less than a High School diploma,” the second is “High School diploma.” That’s it, other than being “illiterate or unable to read and write English.” College and advanced degrees do not matter except in the sense that they confer skills.
For skill levels there is “unskilled,” “semi-skilled,” and “skilled.”
“Transferability of skills” has to do with how long it would take to learn a new job to which your skills could transfer, i.e. 30 days, 60 days, or longer. You can’t transfer skills from unskilled.
For work levels, which are described as “exertional limitations,” there are five categories: (1) Sedentary; (2) Light; (3) Medium; (4) Heavy; (5) and Very Heavy. I won’t go into how each one is defined but there are specific definitions for each. Doctors often call anything that is less strenuous than the job the person was originally doing as “light,” but that may not meet the definition used by SSA. You therefore have to be careful to get the actual limitations from the doctor in terms of weights carried, amount of time standing and walking, lifting, amount of time sitting, etc. We have forms that we send the doctors for this.
If you are unable to do your regular job, SSA will next define how much work you can do from an exertional standpoint based on the medical opinions, and plug you into the “Grid” to make their determination. The difference between being able to do “Medium” work versus “Light” or “Light” versus “Sedentary” can make the difference in whether the benefits are awarded or denied, so this is critical in these types of cases.
If you have “non-exertional” impairments, such as environmental restrictions, or mental impairments, the Grid does not strictly apply and SSA has to employ a vocational expert to give an opinion on your specific situation. The Grid rules can still be used as a guide, however.
In terms of MCS cases, assuming we are not approaching it from a mental impairment perspective, the issues are environmental. You must be able to work on a regular basis without any accommodations being made for you. If you are sensitive to perfume, for example, there is really no job you can do as you will inevitably have to come into contact with someone, either from the general public, or co-employees, who will be wearing something. If the problem is cleaning products, you can’t control what is used to clean the building, which are usually the harshest chemicals available that are not actually banned. The same is true of pesticides, as most buildings have regular spraying programs. If air fresheners are used in bathrooms, you can’t use those facilities and would have to leave the building, which may not be allowed.
Therefore, the vocational issues usually aren’t that significant in MCS cases. However, if your main problems are fatigue or pain, they can play a role. Otherwise, my only question to the vocational expert is “assuming that the claimant has all of the sensitivities alleged, would there be any jobs?” The answer is always “no.” Again, work out of the home or part time work, or work where accommodations are made, is not considered “substantial gainful employment.” You must be able to take a 40 hour per week job, not have to be absent more than one or two days per month, and not need any special accommodations.
Jobs
Just a word here about what we mean by “jobs.” SSA does not consider what they call “employer hiring practices.” This means they do not consider whether or not you may be discriminated against due to the presence of various impairments. In reality, employers don’t want to hire people who have problems. SSA does not live in reality. They only consider if you could actually do the job on a regular and consistent basis over time IF it were offered to you.
They also don’t consider how much the job pays, what the benefits are, or where it is located. They don’t consider how you would get to work so long as you can take public transportation. It does not matter if there is actually any public transportation where you happen to live. They are looking at this from a national perspective. If you can’t drive, you can move to someplace where there is a bus or train. For MCS people, however, public transportation can be a particular problem as you are forced to remain in close proximity to others who may be wearing something to which you are sensitive. Therefore, if you can’t tolerate that, and you can’t drive due to fumes on the street, you wouldn’t be able to work.
To be continued.
Link to all columns by Michael Walkup.
###
This series on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and disability rights is written by Michael Walkup, attorney at law.
Michael is an experienced disability practitioner with more than 25 years experience in the disability law field. In 2001, he became disabled due to Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS). He now provides a service to advise clients with potential disability claims who have MCS, CFS and/or FMS. As these programs and law are usually federal, he is able to practice in all 50 states and, therefore, represent clients regardless of location.
Michael is a long time Sustaining Member of the National Organization for Social Security Claimants’ Representatives, the only national body for disability representatives. He is also certified as a Federal Trial Lawyer and is admitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veteran’s Claims.
Michael would welcome the opportunity to possibly help with disability claims. For more information, visit his website MCS Legal Help at walkuplaw.com. Contact info: email MJWalkup@Amertech.net or call 866-880-4878.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.














jacki
23. Jul, 2009
Micael, thanks for your informative information.
I didnt do well with a civil saw suit. I now have NO job without unemployment..no income..
I am thinking of trying to file for disability…I have to avoid public buildings at all cost.. how do you do the court system and stay out of the court room? I will be contacting you for more information..
I was avoiding getting disability but it looks like I might have to now.
I am 52, had MCS for 10 yrs..I am a RN and medical record coder with a CCS
I lost my job Nov 08 after they took away my private office and had me move into a prefab modular trailer building with new carpet, wallpapper, VOC’s,
copymachines, tons of charts with ink..printers..and 30 other co workers and all their personal care synthetic scented products, cleaning products..
the list goes on & on…
again thanks for sharing should a “good” article
jacki
Karen
23. Jul, 2009
Michael,
Thank you for writing this series on MCS disability cases.
This information is a great benefit to those of us who deal with these issues. When I began research in this area about five years ago (while in medical leave from my job, which I fortunately did return to with accommodation), it was very hard to find an authoritative source on the legal scenarios that applied in different situations.
Karen
Susie Collins
23. Jul, 2009
Jacki and Karen, I’m sure Michael will check in soon to respond to your comments. Aren’t we lucky to have him fighting for our cause?
Michael Walkup
24. Jul, 2009
I will be addressing the question of staying out of the courtroom in a later entry. On SSD cases, if my client is alleging senstivity to ordinary office situations, I request an accomodation where we can do the hearing with the client calling in and being on a speaker in the hearing room. I am also there only by speaker phone. We can also have experts from different parts of the country likewise call in to give testimony. It is probably good to have one person on our side in the room just to keep the other participants from passing notes to one another or making faces. A spouse or friend or especially someone from the doctor’s office such as a nurse or counsellor that the client is seeing or the doctor in person can do that.
The same goes for medical exams. We request whatever accomodations are needed before agreeing to allow our client to go to any exams or request that SSA send the doctor for a home visit. Usually they can’t comply with either request fully which underscores what the client has to go through to get to a job.
The risk of all this is that the case may be denied at that level, but MCS cases are very rarely, if ever, approved prior to a hearing anyway, unless they are approached from a mental impairment standpoint or there is another problem of disabling severity present.
I do have one case on appeal where the judge wouldn’t allow the telephone testimony. This case would probably have been lost before that judge anyway. I feel that this kind of refusal just shows how ignorant and/biased the judge is so it may help with the appeal.