U.S. government poised to overhaul chemical policy
Posted on Jan 26, 2009 by Susie Collins in Blog, Policy, Products
Transforming the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to prevent toxic chemicals from causing human illness and environmental damage is now a high priority.
Yesterday, I reported on the U.S. General Accountability Office audit that found the Environmental Protection Agency a failure on U.S. chemical policy. “It is now time to revise and strengthen EPA’s chemicals management and risk assessment programs,” said Lisa Jackson, new head of the EPA, in response to the GAO report.
Today, Enviroblog at the Environmental Working Group reports on the details of the audit, which included placing as a high priority “transforming the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to prevent toxic chemicals from causing human illness and environmental damage.” The Enviroblog post also presses for more comprehensive action to protect public health, calling for passage of the Kid-Safe Chemicals Act.
To make sure policymakers don’t neglect critical government functions that are falling into near-terminal disrepair, GAO maintains a list of “high risk” government operations that involve, among other things, public health and safety, national security, economic stability or vast sums of money.
Over the years, GAO’s fix-it list has included agencies that permitted the savings and loan crisis of the early 1990s, air traffic control modernization, defense and aerospace procurement, the Medicare and Medicaid programs, pension protections and homeland security.
Last week, GAO added three new urgent priorities to the list, which now totals 30:
- Modernizing the U.S. financial regulatory system.
- Improving the federal Food and Drug Administration’s ability to assure the safety and effectiveness of drugs and medical devices;
- Transforming the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to prevent toxic chemicals from causing human illness and environmental damage.
It’s sobering to see the toxic chemicals problem sharing equal billing with the global economic meltdown. GAO’s bill of particulars, laid out in a 99-page report, is chilling:
- EPA has assessed the risk of just 9 assessments of chemicals that could have serious impacts on human health.
- EPA’s backlog of 70 assessments has hardly budged in years. Some chemicals were under study as long as 9 years. Well more than half the agency’s 540 assessment may be outdated.
Here’s a disturbing set of facts: what year did the federal government’s Report on Carcinogens first list dioxin as a suspected human carcinogen? 1981. What year did the report upgrade that classification to known human carcinogen? 2001.
What year does EPA expect to wind up its assessment of dioxin? 2015-2017, according to GAO.
GAO blamed interference from the Bush White House for some crucial delays. Others, it said, were caused by EPA managers – who, at the highest level, are White House political appointees.
The Obama administration is expected to be far more aggressive in regulating toxic chemicals. But GAO says that it will need better tools: the Toxic Substances Control Act won’t be up to the job.
That was clear from the moment it was enacted — in 1976, to be precise. That’s why the Environmental Working Group and other health and consumer groups are working for passage of the Kid-Safe Chemicals Act. Current law places the burden of proof on EPA to prove an industrial chemical is not safe. Consequently, some 80,000 chemicals have never been tested for safety.
The Kid-Safe act would put the burden on chemical companies to show their products are safe before they are placed on the market. And the companies, not the taxpayers, would pay for testing.
Until somebody does something major, GAO said, “the nation lacks assurance that human health and the environment are adequately protected.”
In other words – fix it!
Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, DC that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment.
Photo by gwENvision. Chem Central chemical plant explosion and fire in Kansas City, February 2007.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.










Anna
26. Jan, 2009
Hey Susie,
Maybe all the yellow canariess should run the EPA. I think we could get alot of updates done in say. ~ Three weeks.
Have a beautiful day. Your blog is AWESOME!!!!
Hugs and Love
Anna
Kerry
27. Jan, 2009
Hi Susie, I haven’t been around for awhile to read your excellent blog with abundant, up to date information. I’ve missed it!
To read that the past administration cost us nearly a decade of stagnation on chemical safety is sad and frustrating. Yet to hear that now the past actions have come into the light and action is going to be taken, gives hope…hope all of us canaries (and the non-canaries as well) need; that we will see the day when our products, our air, etc…are as safe as they can be!
Thank you Susie for your hard work in getting important info. to us as soon as it’s released… Kerry
Leslie
27. Jan, 2009
Fix it, is right!
it’s amazing how fast things are changing in 2009 already- looks like the stagnation is about to get a kick in the butt, and bring in the new, more modern crew to asess this situation. The chemical companies have gotten away with too much for too long. Just the fact that Obama is ousting Lobbiests is going to make those chem companies shiver in their boots. because when lies and crooked dealings are taken out the picture, these guys will be standing there for all to see and it’s not going to be pretty what they covered up to sell us their goods.
The EPA needs to stop being a business and start being the service they were meant to be!!!!!
Susie Collins
28. Jan, 2009
Anna, I know what you mean! We could save everybody so much time and money with just one breath. Basically, every single product to which our bodies respond in a negative way are proving to be toxic. What takes government decades to figure out, takes us ONE BREATH.
Kerry, what is so heartening is that they are talking about going back and reassessing the entire testing paradigm. Chemicals need to be proven safe FIRST before being used in consumer goods.
Leslie, you made a very important observation about the impact of removing lobbyists from the process. And I’m heartened to see the entire regulatory system appears to be about to undergo a huge restructuring. Public and environmental health as high priorities– yay!